Questioning skills/idea/goal:
sometimes my essential question got a bit muddied
Research:
I did lots of research for this and even got through most of Kapital vol. 1
Evidence:
It didn't lend itself to a lot of numbers or statistics, but the facts were there.
Planning:
I posted one journal as I was in the middle of working on the podcast, and met with my coordinators on a nearly daily basis.
Product:
Creativity - I had to come up with a way to present the basics of Marxism in an interesting and less confusing way, hence the Blade metaphor
Collaboration - My coordinators showed me a lot of stuff I could do with audacity that I never would have thought of and read through my script. Outside of E=MC^2 ers I had my parents and friends read it through and bugged them by trying to bounce ideas off of them and rambling about Marxism for weeks
Critical thinking - There is some analysis in the follow-up posts to my podcast (coming soon)
Communication - Its a podcast. I was able to communicate my ideas by the very nature of the product.
Curiosity - I was curious to see if I could effectively explain Marx and hopefully I was right...
Things I could have done better:
It didn't turn out as cohesive as I hoped... a better format for this would have been video, but that takes a while to do well and it was an extremely busy month.
I could have been clearer, but it's also a very confusing topic so I probably couldn't have done this perfectly.
The podcast could have had more audio effects in it, I just don't know if that would have improved it or if it would have been distracting.
Comments